How the approach to blending non-vintage Champagne is shifting

While consistency is still the name of the game, Essi Avellan MW explains why many of the big houses are rethinking the way they blend their non-vintage Champagne

Words by Essi Avellan MW

champagne cellar

The key promise of non-vintage Champagne has always been one of consistency. Skillful blending is practised to even out vintage differences and to craft an identifiable house style. But the changing climate and a new way of thinking are altering the approach to non-vintage cuvées for many houses.

‘Today, due to climate change and our way of working in the vineyards, the grapes ripen well and there is no longer a need to “correct” the wines,’ says Jean-Baptiste Lécaillon, chef de cave at Louis-Roederer, which recently replaced its Brut Premier NV with the more vintage-specific Collection cuvée. Consistency from one edition to the next is no longer integral, with the goal that the non-vintage should taste of its origins and its main harvest year – just as any other wine. ‘In the future, we will be fighting for freshness instead of ripeness,’ Lécaillon adds.

Jean-Baptiste Lécaillon - Champagne
Jean-Baptiste Lécaillon, chef de cave at Louis-Roederer, says consistency from one edition to the next is no longer integral

In order to preserve freshness in its Collection cuvées, Roederer has installed large-sized tanks for keeping its new perpetual reserve (initiated in 2012) as fresh as possible. As each harvest base year is allowed to show its strengths in the blend, so each new cuvée now comes numbered. Collection 242 (based on the 2017 harvest) represents the 242nd time Louis Roederer has crafted a brut non-vintage since the house’s foundation in 1776.

Roederer was not the first to give a distinct identity to each brut non-vintage blend. That accolade goes to Charles Heidsieck, where former chef de cave Daniel Thibaut introduced the Mis en Cave concept for the house’s Brut Réserve back in the mid-1990s, whereby the front label revealed the year when the bottle was laid in the cellars for second fermentation and ageing. Thibaut, though, was way ahead of his time and the concept was deemed too complex to become the norm across the region.

Even if brut non-vintages are Champagne’s classics, their recipes are constantly on the move

That said, houses like Philipponnat and Bruno Paillard have long been looking to solve the problem of ‘agelessness’ and a lack of transparency in the brut non-vintages by communicating disgorgement dates or base years. But it was Jacquesson which, in 2000, crafted its Cuvée 700 series, allowing full transparency and a much greater stylistic freedom to every blend.

Since then, even multi-vintaged prestige cuvées such as Krug Grande Cuvée and Laurent-Perrier Grande Siècle have adopted this sensible policy. As a result, multi-vintages have attracted much more interest and accrued a heightened ‘collectability’ factor.

Charles Heidsieck Brut Réserve – Charles Heidsieck Cellars
Undergound at Charles Heidsieck - a house where changes in the climate and the market have meant tweaking the recipe for the house's classic NV

Even if brut non-vintages are Champagne’s classics, their recipes are constantly on the move. The most obvious recent example is probably that of Charles Heidsieck, where both the changing climate and the brand’s unprecedented commercial success have forced chef de cave Cyril Brun to rethink its classic recipe. To balance out the somewhat shortened lees-ageing time (which, due to sluggish sales, had at times crept up to over 60 months), Brun took the average age of the reserve wines down a touch; then, to compensate, he increased their share to as high as 46 per cent and also increased the use of oak ageing. Oak barrels or vats have also been reintroduced in the NV formula of, among others, Veuve Clicquot and Lanson, with the aim of adding complexity and textural touches.

But perhaps the most noticeable change when it comes to brut non-vintages – for consumers, at least – has been in the dramatically lowered sugar levels. The acidity no longer needs masking and some phenolics are welcome in the wines for added freshness. As a result, sugar levels are dramatically lower than before, 8 to 9g/l dosage being typical today. Some of the lowest dosed brut non-vintages include Bollinger’s Special Cuvée at 7-8g/l and Drappier Carte d’Or at 6,5g/l. Even Moët & Chandon has reduced its dosage to 7g/l with chef de cave Benoît Gouez promising further lowering in the future.

Nine non-and-multi-vintage Champagnes whose blending style stands out

Producer Name Vintage Region Subregion
Laurent-Perrier, Grand Siècle Les Réserves No.20 Brut NV
Champagne
Laurent-Perrier Grand Siècle Les Réserves No.20 Brut NV Champagne N/A
Laurent-Perrier, Grand Siècle Iteration No.23 Brut NV
Champagne
Laurent-Perrier Grand Siècle Iteration No.23 Brut NV Champagne N/A
Laurent-Perrier, Grand Siècle Iteration No.25 Brut NV
Champagne
Laurent-Perrier Grand Siècle Iteration No.25 Brut NV Champagne N/A
Krug, Grand Cuveé 170th Edition Brut NV
Champagne
Krug Grand Cuveé 170th Edition Brut NV Champagne N/A
Louis Roederer, Collection 242 Brut NV
Champagne
Louis Roederer Collection 242 Brut NV Champagne N/A
Charles Heidsieck, Brut Réserve NV
Champagne
Charles Heidsieck Brut Réserve NV Champagne N/A
Jacquesson, Cuvée 740 Dégorgement Tardif Brut Nature NV
Champagne
Jacquesson Cuvée 740 Dégorgement Tardif Brut Nature NV Champagne N/A
Bollinger, Special Cuvée Brut NV
Champagne
Bollinger Special Cuvée Brut NV Champagne N/A
Jacquesson, Cuvée 745 Extra Brut NV
Champagne
Jacquesson Cuvée 745 Extra Brut NV Champagne N/A